SOFT4Lessee vs Trullion
Two of twelve models named SOFT4Lessee first on the direct prompt; zero named Trullion. SOFT4Lessee was named by seven of the twelve models and Trullion by eleven and SOFT4Lessee carries 10 labels and Trullion 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
SOFT4LesseeFirst choices, of twelve modelsTrullion
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
SOFT4Lessee Trullion first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SOFT4Lessee on the left and Trullion on the right.The direct prompt
SOFT4Lessee first, Trullion an alternative
2 of 12 modelsTrullion was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
SOFT4Lessee0%#– of 9Trullion0%#7 of 9SOFT4Lessee6%#5 of 12Trullion4%#6 of 12SOFT4Lessee0%#– of 10Trullion0%#10 of 10What the models said about SOFT4Lessee
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Overall best for mid‑sized companies ... SOFT4Lessee for a balanced mid‑market choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“FinQuery (LeaseQuery) and SOFT4Lessee are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“SOFT4Lessee is the best first shortlist option” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Trullion
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Reports of bugs, slow performance, and gaps in reporting customization.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“often require hefty annual contracts and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Trullion is a top choice for small to large accounting firms, partially due to its AI-driven insights into lease portfolios and financial impacts.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“request a demo for both LeaseQuery (for its pure accounting simplicity) and Trullion (for its AI automation and audit efficiency)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For general lease accounting compliance and automation: LeaseQuery or Trullion.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.