# Boardable vs Nasdaq Boardvantage: which do AI models recommend for board, September 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Board and investor reporting. Zero of twelve models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; two named Nasdaq Boardvantage. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/board-and-investor-reporting/boardable-vs-nasdaq-boardvantage/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boardable | 14% | #2 of 14 | 4% | 25 | 12 of 12 |
| Nasdaq Boardvantage | 5% | #4 of 14 | 35% | 26 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: nasdaq boardvantage first (first choices: Nasdaq Boardvantage) (alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Fairview)
- Llama 4 Maverick: nasdaq boardvantage first (first choices: Nasdaq Boardvantage) (alternatives: Datarails, Fairview)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardEffect, Nasdaq Boardvantage)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Aprio Board Portal, OnBoard) (alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, HighRadius)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Mosaic, OnBoard) (alternatives: Board Intelligence, Cube, Datarails, Govenda, Jirav)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, iBabs)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Fairview)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Diligent) (alternatives: Enboarder, Fello, OnBoard)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Datarails) (alternatives: Cube, Planful)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: OnBoard) (alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Planful)

## What the models said about Boardable

- "Limited governance depth; fewer advanced features; overkill for larger or complex boards" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "If you need a simple, affordable solution for a small board and are comfortable with manual setup: Boardable (Core) or Google Workspace." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For the most affordable and straightforward solution, Boardable is likely the best choice if your needs are basic." (Mistral Small, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Boardable if you have a very small board (under 10 members) and want the lowest per-user cost" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage

- "I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice." (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration" (Kimi K2, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.