Finance AI Index
Index Planning and analysis Financial modeling › Google Sheets vs Microsoft Excel
Financial modeling and scenario planning · September 2026 Edition

Google Sheets vs Microsoft Excel

Zero of twelve models named Google Sheets first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Excel. Google Sheets was named by eight of the twelve models and Microsoft Excel by eight and Google Sheets carries 10 labels and Microsoft Excel 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Google Sheets

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Microsoft Excel

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share13%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels1014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Google Sheets reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datarails was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Datarails vs Google Sheets · Datarails vs Microsoft Excel · Google Sheets vs Cube

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial modeling and scenario planning page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Google SheetsFirst choices, of twelve modelsMicrosoft Excel
Direct00
Paraphrase001 against Microsoft Excel
Comparative01
Budget-constrained65
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Microsoft Excel
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel were named in the same answer sixty-five times, of the 95 answers naming Google Sheets and the 145 naming Microsoft Excel. In those answers Microsoft Excel took the first choice four times and Google Sheets four.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Google Sheets Microsoft Excel first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Google Sheets on the left and Microsoft Excel on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel stood in it.

Neither was named

12 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniDatarails alternatives: Abacum, Anaplan
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, Pigment alternatives: Centage Planning Maestro, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Vena
Perplexity SonarDatarails, Drivetrain alternatives: Anaplan, Planful, Vena
Grok 4.1 FastCube, Datarails alternatives: Drivetrain, Limelight, Pigment, Vena
Mistral SmallDatarails, Limelight alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashLimelight alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful
Llama 4 MaverickDatarails alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Lucanet xP&A, Mosaic, Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashCube alternatives: Fathom, Float, Jedox, Jirav, Planful, Vena
Kimi K2Datarails alternatives: Aleph, Centage Planning Maestro, Cube
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Mosaic, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Datarails alternatives: Cube, Planful

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Google Sheets6%#8 of 13
Microsoft Excel6%#9 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Google Sheets leads by two points.
Google Sheets13%#2 of 8
Microsoft Excel11%#4 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Google Sheets0%#– of 7
Microsoft Excel0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Google Sheets

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Google Sheets or Excel, and optionally use EasyFinancialModels for templates.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets remain the practical sweet spot” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“includes options like Google Sheets or Excel, which are free or low-cost” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Microsoft Excel

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Microsoft Excel | General‑purpose financial modeling | Dominant in finance, powerful formulas, Python in Excel, AI Copilot, wide ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets remain the practical sweet spot, offering functionality, familiarity, and affordability.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For many small businesses, the absolute best tool is the one you likely already own.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.