Finance AI Index
Index Planning and analysis Financial modeling › Planful vs Workday Adaptive Planning
Financial modeling and scenario planning · September 2026 Edition

Planful vs Workday Adaptive Planning

Zero of twelve models named Planful first on the direct prompt; zero named Workday Adaptive Planning. Planful was named by eleven of the twelve models and Workday Adaptive Planning by eleven and Planful carries 18 labels and Workday Adaptive Planning 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Planful

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Workday Adaptive Planning

criticized challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%35%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels1817A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Planful reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datarails was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Datarails vs Planful · Datarails vs Workday Adaptive Planning · Google Sheets vs Planful

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial modeling and scenario planning page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PlanfulFirst choices, of twelve modelsWorkday Adaptive Planning
Direct001 against Planful
Paraphrase221 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Scale-constrained001 against Planful · 2 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Planful and Workday Adaptive Planning were named in the same answer 152 times, of the 306 answers naming Planful and the 386 naming Workday Adaptive Planning. In those answers Workday Adaptive Planning took the first choice nine times and Planful ten.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Planful and Workday Adaptive Planning stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Planful Workday Adaptive Planning first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Planful on the left and Workday Adaptive Planning on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Planful and Workday Adaptive Planning stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, Pigment alternatives: Centage Planning Maestro, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Vena
Perplexity SonarDatarails, Drivetrain alternatives: Anaplan, Planful, Vena
Mistral SmallDatarails, Limelight alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashLimelight alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful
Qwen 3.7 FlashCube alternatives: Fathom, Float, Jedox, Jirav, Planful, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Mosaic, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Datarails alternatives: Cube, Planful

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniDatarails alternatives: Abacum, Anaplan
Grok 4.1 FastCube, Datarails alternatives: Drivetrain, Limelight, Pigment, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickDatarails alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Lucanet xP&A, Mosaic, Vena
Kimi K2Datarails alternatives: Aleph, Centage Planning Maestro, Cube

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Planful0%#– of 13
Workday Adaptive Planning0%#– of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Planful4%#6 of 8
Workday Adaptive Planning4%#7 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Workday Adaptive Planning leads by three points.
Workday Adaptive Planning3%#4 of 7
Planful0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Planful

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“You generally want to avoid enterprise-grade tools (like Anaplan or Workday) which cost thousands per month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend Workday Adaptive Planning if you want the best balance of usability, guided finance workflows, and solid scenario modeling” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.