# Pigment vs Cube: which do AI models recommend for FP&A platforms, September 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, FP&A platforms. Five of twelve models named Pigment first on the direct prompt; one named Cube. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/fpa-platforms/pigment-vs-cube/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pigment | 15% | #2 of 16 | 16% | 38 | 12 of 12 |
| Cube | 8% | #6 of 16 | 8% | 37 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Llama 4 Maverick: pigment first (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: pigment first (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Kimi K2: pigment first (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: pigment first (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- MiniMax M2.5: pigment first (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: cube first (first choices: Cube, Vena) (alternatives: Datarails, Pigment)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Pigment, Prophix, Vena)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful, Vena) (alternatives: Cube, Datarails)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Drivetrain) (alternatives: Bob Finance, Cube, Planful)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Pigment, Prophix, Vena)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Centage) (alternatives: Abacum, Aleph, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Datarails) (alternatives: Planful, Prophix, Vena)

## What the models said about Pigment

- "Avoid or be cautious about enterprise platforms (Anaplan, Workday Adaptive, Planful, Pigment)" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "What to avoid when budget is tight ... overkill for a budget-conscious company" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Pigment and other enterprise platforms have pricing that "scales significantly with user count and data volume."" (MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Pigment | Tech-forward mid-market, driver‑based modeling, rapid scenario analysis | Deep driver‑based modeling ... enterprise‑grade power on short implementation timelines" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Go with Pigment if you are forward-looking, have a modern finance team, and want a highly collaborative, visual, and agile scenario-planning tool." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Cube

- "Avoid pricier ones like Jirav (~$10K/year), Cube/Datarails ($1K+/month)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "you quickly hit "guardrails"... still prone to broken formulas, version-control friction, and performance lag" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.