# Vena vs Cube: which do AI models recommend for FP&A platforms, September 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, FP&A platforms. Two of twelve models named Vena first on the direct prompt; one named Cube. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/fpa-platforms/vena-vs-cube/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vena | 15% | #1 of 16 | 16% | 45 | 12 of 12 |
| Cube | 8% | #6 of 16 | 8% | 37 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: both first (first choices: Cube, Vena) (alternatives: Datarails, Pigment)
- GPT-5.4 mini: vena first (first choices: Planful, Vena) (alternatives: Cube, Datarails)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Pigment, Prophix, Vena)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Drivetrain) (alternatives: Bob Finance, Cube, Planful)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Pigment, Prophix, Vena)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Datarails) (alternatives: Planful, Prophix, Vena)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Centage) (alternatives: Abacum, Aleph, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Pigment) (alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning)

## What the models said about Vena

- ""would rather eat a bullet than use it again." ... Anaplan and Vena are the two with the most consistent negative sentiment" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "If data sovereignty and verified security audits are non-negotiable for you, this is a major red flag." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid: Vena (ongoing performance, learning curve, support, and security concerns)" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Go with Vena if your finance team wants to continue modeling in Excel but needs to eliminate spreadsheet errors and automate data ingestion from your ERP." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Choose Vena or Datarails if you have a small to mid-sized finance team that wants to retain the comfort of using Excel" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Cube

- "Avoid pricier ones like Jirav (~$10K/year), Cube/Datarails ($1K+/month)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "you quickly hit "guardrails"... still prone to broken formulas, version-control friction, and performance lag" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.