Productive vs Teamwork.com
Zero of fourteen models named Productive first on the direct prompt; zero named Teamwork.com. Productive was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Teamwork.com by nine and Productive carries 23 labels and Teamwork.com 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the professional services automation page.
By framing
ProductiveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamwork.com
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Productive and Teamwork.com were named in the same answer ten times, of the 58 answers naming Productive and the 35 naming Teamwork.com. In those answers Teamwork.com took the first choice one time and Productive two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Productive Teamwork.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Productive on the left and Teamwork.com on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Productive15%#2 of 11Teamwork.com2%#6 of 11Productive12%#3 of 10Teamwork.com6%#5 of 10Productive0%#– of 11Teamwork.com0%#– of 11What the models said about Productive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Productive stands out as one of the most affordable full-featured professional services automation (PSA) platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (True PSA Features): Productive ... widely considered the best fit for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive (starting at $9/user/month) or Teamwork.com ... offer the best overall value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Teamwork.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you need the cheapest viable PSA with time tracking + invoicing, Teamwork.com from ~$9.99/user/mo and BigTime Essentials from ~$20/user/mo are the most frequently cited budget-friendly options” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive (starting at $9/user/month) or Teamwork.com ... offer the best overall value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive or Teamwork are the top picks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.