Two of fourteen models named Brightfin first on the direct prompt; one named Sakon. Brightfin was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Sakon by twelve and Brightfin carries 25 labels and Sakon 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the telecom expense management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Brightfin and Sakon were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 72 answers naming Brightfin and the 95 naming Sakon. In those answers Sakon took the first choice three times and Brightfin three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“brightfin: Acquired by Proven Optics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“brightfin — verify post-combination product plans. ... That's a reason to ask about product direction, support ownership, and reference customers” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong automation capabilities and native ServiceNow integration, but reviews note: "Limited functionality outside of ServiceNow environments."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“1. Brightfin ... Best For: Companies already using (or planning to use) ServiceNow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall choice from the results is Brightfin” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“the unified Brightfin brand has established itself as a powerhouse that bridges TEM and IT Financial Management (ITFM)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid for Mid-Market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Caution: While Sakon offers native integration with ServiceNow, it is less widely adopted and may not have the same level of scalability or support” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“AI-driven multi-cloud, telecom and mobility expense tracking with high Gartner ratings, but: "Cons: The steep learning curve for new users."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sakon stands out for its ability to pay vendors directly and automate the entire billing workflow” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with vCom or Sakon if you're mid-market B2B with moderate telecom complexity” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Tangoe, Calero, Sakon, and Cimpl for a broad enterprise TEM comparison” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.