Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Admin By Request · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Admin By Request

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Admin By Request was named 2 times in Corporate performance ma, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business39 of 88

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise27 of 68

under the label threshold

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Admin By Request for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	23 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Admin By Request yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Admin By Request across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Admin By Request is the clear best pick for a company with a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

“Admin By Request (Best Value / Lowest Barrier)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Admin By Request, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admin By Request was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cube3 of 51Not in the top three

ManageEngine3 of 50Not in the top three

Vena2 of 52Not in the top three

CyberFOX AutoElevate2 of 50Not in the top three

Datarails2 of 50Not in the top three

Effy AI2 of 50Not in the top three

Limelight2 of 50Not in the top three

Microsoft Intune EPM2 of 50Not in the top three

Zoho People2 of 50Not in the top three

15Five1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Admin By Request. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Admin By Request and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com5

cyberpress.org4

cybersecuritynews.com4

drivetrain.ai4

golimelight.com4

effy.ai3

thecfoclub.com3

heimdalsecurity.com2

lupahire.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Admin By Request came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-epm-tools-compared-25

cyberpress.org/epm-tools-by-business-size-34

cybersecuritynews.com/best-endpoint-privilege-management-tools/amp4

golimelight.com/blog/best-epm-software4

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software3

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business3

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-epm-software3

heimdalsecurity.com/blog/privileged-access-management-pam-software-solutions2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Admin By Request's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Admin By Request, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adminbyrequest.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.