# Board: how AI models rank it, September 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 26 judge labels across 6 categories by 11 of 12 models. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/vendors/board/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 18 | 0% | 9 |
| Corporate performance management | 0% | 22 | 0% | 5 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 23 | 0% | 5 |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | 0% | 32 | 0% | 4 |
| Board and investor reporting | 0% | 86 | 50% | 2 |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | 0% | 64 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "Best for: Enterprise-wide integrated planning connecting FP&A, close, consolidation, and reporting" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, FP&A platforms)
- "Choose Board or Oracle EPM if you want a broader enterprise planning suite" (Perplexity Sonar, FP&A platforms)
- "Best for finance teams running repeatable, governed consolidation cycles" (MiniMax M2.5, Financial consolidation)
- "If you need Global Consolidation: Go with OneStream or Board." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, FP&A platforms)

## And against it

- "Good for board books, but consider whether you need deeper analytics... Plan for time-intensive setup and training." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Board)

## Record

- Method: https://finance-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://finance-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, finance-ai-index.com.