Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Brixx · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Brixx

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Brixx was named 3 times in Cash flow forecasting, where Agicap led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business22 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise51 of 79

under the label threshold

In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Brixx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	2%	20 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Brixx yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Brixx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Fathom or Brixx would be better choices for small to medium-sized businesses looking for more comprehensive forecasting capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · first choice

“Dedicated tools like Brixx (~$38/mo) ... make sense once your business grows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

“acts more like a business planning tool for startups” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Brixx, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brixx was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cash Flow Frog8 of 111Not in the top three

Fathom8 of 110Not in the top three

Float6 of 115Not in the top three

LivePlan5 of 112Not in the top three

Anaplan3 of 110Not in the top three

Futrli3 of 110Not in the top three

Pulse3 of 110Not in the top three

Cube2 of 112Not in the top three

Fluidly2 of 111Not in the top three

Kyriba2 of 111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Brixx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Brixx and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cashflowfrog.com5

fathomhq.com5

guideflow.com5

worldmetrics.org5

cubesoftware.com4

g-accon.com4

gitnux.org4

tesorio.com4

zipdo.co4

abacum.ai3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Brixx came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g-accon.com/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software4

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software4

tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared4

abacum.ai/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-for-smbs3

drivetrain.ai/solutions/cash-flow-forecasting-software3

worldmetrics.org/best/cash-forecast-software3

brixx.com/features/scenario-planning2

cashflowfrog.com/2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brixx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brixx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at brixx.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.