Every category where a model named ComplyCube for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	6%	5 of 108	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ComplyCube yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ComplyCube across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels3

Paraphrase12 labels8

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would recommend starting with Ondato or ComplyCube if you need something relatively fast to deploy” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with ComplyCube. It's well-suited for mid-sized B2B companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ComplyCube is arguably the strongest contender for mid-market companies today” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AML monitoring · direct prompt · first choice

“Suited to small businesses needing simple setup, affordable verification, screening, and basic reporting.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ComplyCube, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ComplyCube was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ondato15 of 272Not among the top eight

ComplyAdvantage13 of 273Not among the top eight

iDenfy13 of 271Not among the top eight

Flagright12 of 273Not among the top eight

NICE Actimize9 of 271Not among the top eight

Sumsub8 of 270Not among the top eight

Sanction Scanner7 of 274Not among the top eight

AML Watcher6 of 270Not among the top eight

Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management5 of 270Not among the top eight

SAS4 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ComplyCube. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 27 answers that named ComplyCube and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com22

learn.g2.com20

ondato.com18

thecfoclub.com15

fraud.net14

amlwatcher.com12

sourceforge.net11

sphinxhq.com10

guideflow.com9

softwaresuggest.com9

140 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming ComplyCube came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-anti-money-laundering-software20

ondato.com/blog/best-aml-software18

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-aml-compliance-software15

g2.com/categories/anti-money-laundering12

amlwatcher.com/blog/aml-software-vendors11

fraud.net/resources/top-aml-software10

sphinxhq.com/blog-posts/best-aml-software10

g2.com/categories/anti-money-laundering/small-business9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

complycube.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ComplyCube takes 6% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“complycube”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,164 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,053 · 23 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,521
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

20 ads · 19 text, 1 image · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2022, as TEEMO TECHNOLOGY LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 108 in AML monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ComplyAdvantage

First choices: 11 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on complycube.com

3,674

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

430

Product · Integration

82 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Glossary or explainer	25	2	2026-09-04
Template or tool	17	0	2026-04-24
Report or ebook	13	undated
Case study	5	1	2026-08-05
Comparison	5	0	2026-03-23
Blog	2	0	2026-01-06
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2025-10-13

Most recent

2026-09-04What is a qualified electronic signature qes glossary or explainer
2026-08-14What is perpetual kyc implementation guide glossary or explainer
2026-08-05Iparametrics case study
2026-06-23What is aml risk glossary or explainer
2026-06-12What is database verification glossary or explainer
2026-06-05What is email intelligence glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page complycube.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ComplyCube

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ComplyCube is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: One Platform for Identity Verification, KYC, KYB & AML
complycube.com
For: regulated and high-growth businesses worldwide
complycube.com
Price stated: Starter $99/mo; Core $299/mo; Growth Let’s talk; Enterprise Let’s talk complycube.com/en/pricing
Starting price: 99 complycube.com/en/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start free trial complycube.com
Certifications: ISO 27001:2022ISO 9001:2015UK Cyber EssentialsUK Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework (DIATF)ISO 30107-3 (Presentation Attack Detection Level 2)ACCS 4:2020 Technical Requirements for Age Check SystemsGDPRCCPA
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting, customers

What ComplyCube's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: complycube.com, complycube.com/en/pricing, trust.complycube.com, complycube.com/en/use-cases/process. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ComplyCube's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ComplyCube, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ComplyCube by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ComplyCube is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ComplyCube, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.