Index › Products › Conduit · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Conduit

15Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Conduit was named 6 times in Stablecoin platforms, where BVNK led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 119

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 141

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 111

under the label threshold

In stablecoin platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Conduit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	0%	20 of 141	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conduit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conduit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Conduit specializes in cross-border B2B payouts across 100+ countries, using stablecoins as the transport layer” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

“Conduit if you pay a lot of suppliers in emerging markets or need strong corridor coverage” Perplexity Sonar · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

“specializes in cross-border B2B payments to emerging markets across LATAM and APAC” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“Bridge, BVNK, and Conduit are B2B-first” Muse Glimmer 30B · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conduit, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conduit was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Crypto13 of 154Not among the top eight

BVNK13 of 152Not among the top eight

Eco11 of 153Not among the top eight

Circle6 of 151Not among the top eight

Crossmint6 of 150Not among the top eight

Bridge5 of 152Not among the top eight

Bridge.xyz5 of 151Not among the top eight

Fireblocks5 of 150Not among the top eight

Privy4 of 150Not among the top eight

Sphere4 of 150Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conduit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Conduit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com15

opendue.com9

crossmint.com8

cobo.com7

stablecoininsider.org7

stripe.com6

photonpay.com5

coingape.com4

osl.com4

ripple.com4

No domain is on file for Conduit, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

eco.com/support/en/articles/15232571-best-stablecoin-infrastructure-providers-for-b2b-plat13

opendue.com/blog/best-stablecoin-payment-providers9

cobo.com/post/2026-guide-to-the-most-reliable-stablecoin-payments-providers7

crossmint.com/learn/stablecoin-settlement-platforms-in-20267

eco.com/support/en/articles/14797799-stablecoin-payment-processors-compared-20267

eco.com/support/en/articles/11802493-best-stablecoin-payment-gateways-processors-for-busin5

eco.com/support/en/articles/15261552-top-stablecoin-payment-rails-for-enterprises-20265

eco.com/support/en/articles/15426759-best-stablecoin-payments-for-startups-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Conduit stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 90,500 a month (“conduit”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 41,660 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Conduit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conduit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conduit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conduit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Conduit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conduit, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.