Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Corpay Cross-Border · September 2026 Edition
Corpay · 1 category · Ranked

Corpay Cross-Border

31Judge labels
8First choices
1Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Cross-border payments for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Corpay Cross-Border for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash7%3 of 830%16accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Corpay Cross-Border yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Corpay Cross-Border across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02103
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels6
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd generally recommend Corpay Cross-Border if your priority is both FX hedging and international payments in one platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Corpay Cross-Border (or OFX)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Kantox or Corpay” MiniMax M2.5 · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3–5 providers — good ones to compare given your size include Airwallex ..., Corpay, Payoneer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Corpay Cross-Border, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corpay Cross-Border was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kyriba10 of 316Not in the top three
Payoneer8 of 310Not in the top three
Ebury7 of 312Not in the top three
Thunes7 of 311Not in the top three
Stripe7 of 310Not in the top three
Tipalti6 of 310Not in the top three
Adyen5 of 311Not in the top three
Checkout.com5 of 310Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Corpay Cross-Border. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 31 answers that named Corpay Cross-Border and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

f6s.com15
airwallex.com11
g2.com11
walletinvestor.com10
connectpay.com9
alltopbusiness.com8
wise.com8
corpay.comYour site7
blog.ibanfirst.com6
highradius.com6

Eighty-four of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Corpay Cross-Border came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Corpay Cross-Border

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Corpay Cross-Border; a claim can dispute any of them.
Corpay 12Corpay (formerly Cambridge Global) 1OFX/Corpay 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corpay Cross-Border's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corpay Cross-Border, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corpay.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack