1 category · Named, not rankedEDGARsuite
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 10 of 63 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated EDGARsuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Low-cost filing software such as EDGARsuite is also promoted for "low-cost annual XBRL filings for small companies"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Disclosure reporting · budget prompt · alternative
“Cheapest DIY Option ... EDGARsuite as a lighter, lower-cost alternative if you only need basic filing capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Disclosure reporting · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider EDGARsuite or Federal Filings if you're comfortable with a more service-oriented approach” Kimi K2 · Disclosure reporting · budget prompt · alternative
“AI‑driven XBRL tagging can reduce manual labor and associated costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Disclosure reporting · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EDGARsuite, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EDGARsuite was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named EDGARsuite and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Sixty-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming EDGARsuite came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
edgarsuite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EDGARsuite takes 0% of first choices and Workiva takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“edgarsuite”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 25 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 465
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as EDGARsuite
Follow EDGARsuite
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
EDGARsuite is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- SEC EDGAR Filing Software Solution, compatible with EDGAR NEXT, to prepare and submit HTML, Inline XBRL (iXBRL) and XML filings easily, accurately and cost-effectively - including automated iXBRL tagging with AI.
- For
- small and large filers, law firms, CPAs and filing agents
- Free plan or trial
- free demo edgarsuite.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What EDGARsuite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: edgarsuite.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EDGARsuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EDGARsuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EDGARsuite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where EDGARsuite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name EDGARsuite, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.