Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Experian · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Experian

19Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Experian was named 8 times in B2B credit management, where Tesorio led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 70

under the label threshold

In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Experian for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	0%	28 of 82	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Experian yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Experian across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“trusted platforms like Credit Karma or Experian” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B credit management · negative prompt · first choice

“strong bureau/data layer rather than end-to-end credit workflow automation” Perplexity Sonar · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative

“US-focused with payment trends & stability ratings (IntelliScore)” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High CFPB complaints (e.g., 8K+ each against Experian, Equifax, TransUnion) for unwanted enrollments, hard-to-cancel subscriptions, hidden fees” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · negative prompt · soft negative

“Hidden costs ... Unnecessary charges for info you can get free.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Experian, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Experian was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dun & Bradstreet12 of 190Not in the top three

Creditsafe10 of 194Not in the top three

HighRadius Credit Cloud8 of 194Not in the top three

Equifax6 of 190Not in the top three

Atradius4 of 190Not in the top three

AnnualCreditReport.com3 of 192Not in the top three

Chaser3 of 191Not in the top three

Paidnice3 of 191Not in the top three

Satago3 of 191Not in the top three

Bectran3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Experian. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 19 answers that named Experian and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tesorio.com9

f6s.com7

nuvo.com7

worldmetrics.org7

agentcollect.com6

highradius.com6

resolvepay.com6

guideflow.com5

capitalise.com4

chaserhq.com4

Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Experian came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tesorio.com/blog/the-5-best-credit-risk-management-software-platforms-for-b2b-finance-team9

nuvo.com/resources/credit-management-software7

agentcollect.com/blog/b2b-credit-risk-management6

f6s.com/software/category/b2b-credit-risk-management6

highradius.com/resources/Blog/top-credit-risk-management-tools6

guideflow.com/blog/credit-management-software5

capitalise.com/gb/insights/business-credit-scores/best-credit-risk-management-tools4

creditpulse.com/blog/best-credit-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Experian

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Experian; a claim can dispute any of them.

Experian Business 2Creditsafe/Experian 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Experian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Experian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at experian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.