Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › FloQast Tax Provision · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

FloQast Tax Provision

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FloQast Tax Provision was named 1 time in Corporate tax provision, where Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 101

under the label threshold

Mid-market42 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FloQast Tax Provision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	42 of 98	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FloQast Tax Provision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FloQast Tax Provision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if you prefer a lighter, more modern cloud solution with faster onboarding and lower total cost of ownership, FloQast Tax Provision is increasingly popular” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FloQast Tax Provision, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloQast Tax Provision was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision2 of 21Not in the top three

Longview Tax2 of 20Not in the top three

Lucasys Tax Provision2 of 20Not in the top three

Sovos Tax Provision2 of 20Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Provision1 of 20Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik1 of 20Not in the top three

Oracle Tax Reporting1 of 20Not in the top three

Vertex1 of 20Not in the top three

Workiva1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FloQast Tax Provision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named FloQast Tax Provision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coefficient.io2

floqast.comYour site2

gitnux.org2

houseblend.io2

worldmetrics.org2

zipdo.co2

ctacquisitions.com1

curatesuite.com1

g2.com1

gaugius.com1

Fourteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming FloQast Tax Provision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coefficient.io/month-end-close/floqast-pricing2

floqast.com/pricing2

gitnux.org/best/deferred-tax-software2

worldmetrics.org/best/tax-provision-software2

zipdo.co/best/corporate-tax-provision-software2

ctacquisitions.com/best-tax-software-for-ma-20261

curatesuite.com/accounting/tools/floqast1

g2.com/products/floqast/features1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FloQast Tax Provision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FloQast Tax Provision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at floqast.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.