Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › HockeyStack · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

HockeyStack

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HockeyStack was named 4 times in SaaS metrics, where ChartMogul led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market18 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HockeyStack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	18 of 81	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HockeyStack yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HockeyStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your primary struggle is connecting your ad spend to actual revenue, HockeyStack is the superior choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · alternative

“Pick HockeyStack if you want faster time-to-value with AI-powered insights” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you need advanced attribution, consider Dreamdata or HockeyStack.” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HockeyStack, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HockeyStack was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul4 of 44Not in the top three

Databox2 of 41Not in the top three

Baremetrics2 of 40Not in the top three

Dreamdata2 of 40Not in the top three

Mixpanel2 of 40Not in the top three

PostHog2 of 40Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics2 of 40Not in the top three

Amplitude1 of 40Not in the top three

Founderpath1 of 40Not in the top three

Kissmetrics1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HockeyStack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named HockeyStack and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

saashero.net3

baremetrics.com2

clickup.com2

databox.com2

designrevision.com2

hockeystack.comYour site2

portermetrics.com2

a88lab.com1

amplitude.com1

artisangrowthstrategies.com1

Sixteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming HockeyStack came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

saashero.net/strategy/best-b2b-saas-analytics-tools3

clickup.com/blog/saas-analytics-tools2

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools2

portermetrics.com/en/compare/saas-reporting-tools2

saashero.net/competitor/best-b2b-saas-arr-tools2

saashero.net/strategy/best-b2b-revenue-attribution-tools2

saashero.net/strategy/best-b2b-saas-arr-tools2

a88lab.com/blog/attribution-tools-b2b-saas1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HockeyStack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HockeyStack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hockeystack.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.