# Nasdaq Boardvantage: how AI models rank it, September 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 28 judge labels across 2 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/vendors/nasdaq-boardvantage/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | 5% | 6 | 35% | 26 |
| Entity management | 0% | 86 | 100% | 2 |

## What the models said for it

- "If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice." (Mistral Small, Board)
- "Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)" (MiniMax M2.5, Board)
- "Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration" (Kimi K2, Board)
- "Best for large enterprise governance: Diligent Boards or Nasdaq Boardvantage." (GPT-5.4 mini, Board)

## And against it

- "I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint" (Perplexity Sonar, Board)
- "What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies" (MiniMax M2.5, Board)
- "it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Board)
- "avoiding traditional enterprise portals (such as Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage)... $5,000 to $15,000+ per year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Board)

## Record

- Method: https://finance-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://finance-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Finance AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, finance-ai-index.com.