Every category where a model named Request Finance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	0%	41 of 141	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Request Finance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Request Finance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels4

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for B2B Invoicing & Contractor Payouts: Request Finance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Request Finance, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Request Finance was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Crypto12 of 214Not among the top eight

BVNK8 of 212Not among the top eight

Coinbase Commerce7 of 212Not among the top eight

BitPay5 of 210Not among the top eight

Bitwave4 of 212Not among the top eight

Coinbase Business4 of 211Not among the top eight

Cryptio4 of 211Not among the top eight

Bridge3 of 212Not among the top eight

Eco3 of 211Not among the top eight

TRES Finance3 of 211Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Request Finance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named Request Finance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com14

requestfinance.comYour site8

pro.edgex.exchange7

osl.com6

photonpay.com5

stripe.com5

vaultnow.co5

allium.so4

allscale.io4

bitwave.io4

Fifty-four of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Request Finance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

eco.com/support/en/articles/14797799-stablecoin-payment-processors-compared-202611

pro.edgex.exchange/en-US/news/article/best-stablecoin-payment-platforms-20267

eco.com/support/en/articles/15083177-best-crypto-payment-gateways-20266

osl.com/en/bits/article/best-enterprise-stablecoin-payment-platforms-comparison-review6

vaultnow.co/blog/stablecoin-payment-processors5

breezing.io/blog/best-crypto-accounting-subledger-tools4

eco.com/support/en/articles/15232571-best-stablecoin-infrastructure-providers-for-b2b-plat4

milkroad.com/tax/accounting4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

requestfinance.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Request Finance takes 0% of first choices and BVNK takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “stablecoin platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “stablecoin payments platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 170 a month (“request finance”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 35 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 166 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 169 · 4 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,918
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

3 ads · 3 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Request Finance, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 41 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 21 answers
Its own site cited: in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on requestfinance.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

15 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	19	12	2026-09-24
Case study	6	3	2026-08-10	Crypto accounting
Comparison	5	1	2026-09-09
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-24How to pay affiliates in stablecoins blog
2026-09-22Influencer payment platforms compared blog
2026-09-12Best crypto invoicing platforms blog
2026-09-11How to invoice clients in stablecoins blog
2026-09-09Stablecoin cross border payments vs swift comparison
2026-09-02Freelancers contractors paid in stablecoins blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page requestfinance.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Request Finance

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Request Finance is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Business account and payment platform for global companies. Accounts payable, stablecoin payments, and accounting reconciliation.
requestfinance.com
For: finance teams
requestfinance.com
Price stated: Transparent pricing, from $50 a month. requestfinance.com
Starting price: 50 requestfinance.com
Free plan or trial: Get started for free; no credit card required; explore the platform free for 30 days; start for free with invoicing, without KYB. requestfinance.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 1 audited
Customers named: Near ProtocolGelatoYurtofunThe SandboxNested FinanceVeridaOpenZeppelinMerit Circle
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Request Finance's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: requestfinance.com, requestfinance.com/pricing, requestfinance.com/use-cases/mass-payouts, requestfinance.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Request Finance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Request Finance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Request Finance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Request Finance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Request Finance, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.