Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › SupplierGATEWAY · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SupplierGATEWAY

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SupplierGATEWAY was named 1 time in Supplier management, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market50 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise38 of 87

under the label threshold

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SupplierGATEWAY for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	50 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SupplierGATEWAY yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SupplierGATEWAY across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Compliance & Diversity Reporting” Kimi K2 · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SupplierGATEWAY, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SupplierGATEWAY was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Ariba3 of 30Not in the top three

Gatekeeper2 of 32Not in the top three

Coupa2 of 30Not in the top three

Creditsafe1 of 30Not in the top three

Kissflow Procurement1 of 30Not in the top three

Manhattan Associates1 of 30Not in the top three

Oracle1 of 30Not in the top three

Precoro1 of 30Not in the top three

Procurify1 of 30Not in the top three

SourceDay1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SupplierGATEWAY. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named SupplierGATEWAY and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

mindsprint.com2

us.fitgap.com2

apsentra.com1

atlassystems.com1

auravms.com1

capterra.com1

compliancely.com1

costloop.app1

creditpulse.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming SupplierGATEWAY came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/vendor-management-software2

apsentra.com/best-vendor-management-software1

atlassystems.com/blog/best-supplier-onboarding-software1

auravms.com/blogs/vendor-management-system-pricing-cost-smb-20261

capterra.com/vendor-management-software1

compliancely.com/blog/vendor-onboarding-software-comparison1

costloop.app/blog/vendor-management-software-pricing1

creditpulse.com/blog/vendor-onboarding-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SupplierGATEWAY

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SupplierGATEWAY; a claim can dispute any of them.

SupplierGateway 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SupplierGATEWAY's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SupplierGATEWAY, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at suppliergateway.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.