| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stablecoin platforms | Treasury and cash | 0% | 141 of 141 | 100% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The TerraUSD collapse is the classic cautionary example: the SEC found investors were misled about the mechanism used to maintain the peg, and the ecosystem later collapsed.” GPT-5.4 mini · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“The multi-billion-dollar collapse of TerraUSD (UST) in 2022 is the most prominent example of an algorithmic stablecoin completely failing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid entirely (high systemic risk): Algorithmic or uncollateralized stablecoins like TerraUSD (UST) remnants” Grok 4.1 Fast · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Completely: Failed / Collapsed Stablecoins ... The biggest disaster in stablecoin history” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named TerraUSD and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for TerraUSD, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TerraUSD's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TerraUSD, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TerraUSD by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: