Lease accounting · September 2026 Edition
iLeasePro vs Visual Lease
One of twelve models named iLeasePro first on the direct prompt; two named Visual Lease. iLeasePro was named by nine of the twelve models and Visual Lease by twelve and iLeasePro carries 17 labels and Visual Lease 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share12%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1741A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, iLeasePro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.FinQuery was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. FinQuery vs iLeasePro · FinQuery vs Visual Lease
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
iLeaseProFirst choices, of twelve modelsVisual Lease
Direct12
Paraphrase131 against iLeasePro
Comparative01
Budget-constrained401 against Visual Lease
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Visual Lease
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where iLeasePro and Visual Lease stood in it.
iLeasePro first, Visual Lease not the choice
1 of 12 modelsVisual Lease was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickiLeasePro alternatives: EZLease, LeaseAccelerator, Leasecake, SOFT4Lessee
Visual Lease first, iLeasePro an alternative
2 of 12 modelsiLeasePro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GLM 4.7 FlashXFinQuery, Visual Lease alternatives: DebtBook, SOFT4Lessee, iLeasePro
MiniMax M2.5FinQuery, Visual Lease alternatives: Spacebase
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5SOFT4Lessee alternatives: EZLease, FinQuery, Trullion, Visual Lease
GPT-5.4 miniFinQuery alternatives: Nakisa Lease Administration, Sage Intacct, UGAAP, Yardi Corom, iLeasePro
Gemini 3.5 FlashFinQuery alternatives: NetLease, SOFT4Lessee, Trullion, Visual Lease
Perplexity SonarFinQuery, Spacebase alternatives: EZLease, SOFT4Lessee, Visual Lease
Grok 4.1 FastFinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Visual Lease
Mistral SmallFinQuery, SOFT4Lessee alternatives: EZLease, Trullion, Visual Lease
DeepSeek V4 FlashFinQuery alternatives: Crunchafi, LeaseCrunch, NetLease, Visual Lease
Qwen 3.7 FlashFinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Spacebase, iLeasePro
Kimi K2FinQuery alternatives: EZLease, iLeasePro
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
iLeasePro leads by nineteen points.
iLeasePro19%#2 of 9Visual Lease0%#9 of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
iLeasePro leads by two points.
iLeasePro12%#2 of 12Visual Lease10%#3 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: Visual Lease leads at enterprise.
Visual Lease15%#2 of 10iLeasePro0%#– of 10What the models said about iLeasePro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid for Dual Standards: iLeasePro or EZLease—excellent for pure ASC 842 in US-only mid-market setups but lack robust IFRS 16/multi-currency support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“iLeasePro - a cloud-based lease management and lease accounting software that helps mid-market companies comply with the FASB ASC 842 lease accounting changes” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“iLeasePro (specifically its iLeaseXpress tier) stands out as one of the best and most affordable dedicated lease accounting software options” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“iLeaseXpress and iLeasePro are excellent choices, especially if you have a small number of leases” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visual Lease
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Visual Lease: Steep learning curve, reporting that "doesn't always bend the way you want," slow performance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“users frequently report that the reporting tool is rigid and less customizable than desired” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“often require hefty annual contracts and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visual Lease and iLeasePro are the top recommendations due to their strong compliance features, mid-market focus” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Visual Lease if you are a large enterprise needing heavy analytics and complex workflows.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with FinQuery or Visual Lease. Both are leaders in the mid-market space” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.