Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Visual Lease · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Visual Lease

105Judge labels
11First choices
19Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Lease accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 41 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Visual Lease for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lease accountingAccounting and close10%3 of 607%41accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visual Lease yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visual Lease across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash04026
Perplexity Sonar11103
Grok 4.1 Fast04105
Mistral Small12003
DeepSeek V4 Flash04015
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K204105
GLM 4.7 FlashX13004
MiniMax M2.512003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels4
Paraphrase21 labels4
Comparative28 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Visual Lease and iLeasePro are the top recommendations due to their strong compliance features, mid-market focus” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Visual Lease if you are a large enterprise needing heavy analytics and complex workflows.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with FinQuery or Visual Lease. Both are leaders in the mid-market space” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“for most mid-market B2B companies, FinQuery or Visual Lease would be excellent starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Visual Lease: Steep learning curve, reporting that "doesn't always bend the way you want," slow performance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“users frequently report that the reporting tool is rigid and less customizable than desired” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“often require hefty annual contracts and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visual Lease, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visual Lease was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Trullion49 of 1053Not in the top three
Nakisa Lease Administration43 of 10511Not in the top three
MRI ProLease43 of 1052Not in the top three
LeaseAccelerator37 of 1054Not in the top three
EZLease32 of 1057Not in the top three
NetLease27 of 1050Not in the top three
Black Owl Systems26 of 1051Not in the top three
Crunchafi21 of 1050Not in the top three
CoStar Real Estate Manager20 of 1050Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visual Lease. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 105 answers that named Visual Lease and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com70
debtbook.com58
blackowlsystems.com54
guideflow.com48
capterra.com47
gartner.com44
trullion.com44
acquisition-international.com42
g2.com33
worldmetrics.org33

473 of the 473 domain citations in answers naming Visual Lease came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visual Lease's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visual Lease, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at visuallease.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack