OnBoard vs Diligent Boards
Eleven of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; one named Diligent Boards. OnBoard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Diligent Boards by thirteen and OnBoard carries 39 labels and Diligent Boards 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDiligent Boards
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OnBoard and Diligent Boards were named in the same answer 198 times, of the 262 answers naming OnBoard and the 301 naming Diligent Boards. In those answers Diligent Boards took the first choice sixty times and OnBoard thirty-three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
OnBoard Diligent Boards first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Diligent Boards on the right.The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Diligent Boards an alternative
11 of 14 modelsDiligent Boards was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Diligent Boards first, OnBoard not the choice
1 of 14 modelsOnBoard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
OnBoard8%#4 of 8Diligent Boards0%#8 of 8OnBoard26%#1 of 8Diligent Boards2%#6 of 8Diligent Boards30%#1 of 7OnBoard5%#3 of 7What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“avoid enterprise-heavy giants (like Diligent, OnBoard, or Nasdaq Boardvantage, which often run upwards of $10,000 annually)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, especially for permissions and admin setup... Caution if: Small teams or non-tech-savvy boards” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“OnBoard leads in comparisons for mid-sized companies transitioning from emails/manuals—praised for intuitive interface, comprehensive features, and balance of cost/usability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“OnBoard - serves over 2,000 organizations across 32 countries and offers a balance of features and cost that fits organizations between startup and enterprise.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent Boards
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Industry-standard governance platform with AI-powered meeting summaries... If you're a large public company needing full GRC: → Diligent” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Enterprise governance and secure board portals ... Strengths: Strong security, comprehensive governance features” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.