OnBoard vs Boardable
Eight of twelve models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. Both were named by all twelve models and OnBoard carries 37 labels and Boardable 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of twelve modelsBoardable
The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Boardable not the choice
8 of 12 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Boardable20%#2 of 10OnBoard2%#6 of 10OnBoard25%#1 of 14Boardable14%#2 of 14What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“OnBoard: Frequent gripes about agenda glitches, permission settings, navigation difficulties, and upload issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget... pricing is typically quote-based and often steeper” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Good for board meetings, but be prepared for a learning curve and higher cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“OnBoard is identified as the "UX Leader" of 2026, using AI to automate board book creation and is best for mid-market corporations seeking rapid adoption” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want a single recommendation: choose OnBoard for the best blend of mid-market fit, board functionality, and ease of adoption” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“OnBoard: Highly secure, incredibly intuitive, and widely considered the "sweet spot" for mid-market companies. Excellent mobile UX.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Limited governance depth; fewer advanced features; overkill for larger or complex boards” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you need a simple, affordable solution for a small board and are comfortable with manual setup: Boardable (Core) or Google Workspace.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most affordable and straightforward solution, Boardable is likely the best choice if your needs are basic.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable if you have a very small board (under 10 members) and want the lowest per-user cost” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.