AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Financial modeling › Datarails vs Prophix
Financial modeling and scenario planning · October 2026 Edition

Datarails vs Prophix

Six of fourteen models named Datarails first on the direct prompt; zero named Prophix. Datarails was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Prophix by seven and Datarails carries 20 labels and Prophix 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Datarails

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Prophix

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share11%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2010A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Datarails reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cube was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Excel vs Datarails · Microsoft Excel vs Prophix · Cube vs Datarails

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial modeling and scenario planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DatarailsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProphix
Direct60
Paraphrase04
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained101 against Prophix
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Datarails and Prophix were named in the same answer seventy-eight times, of the 323 answers naming Datarails and the 244 naming Prophix. In those answers Prophix took the first choice three times and Datarails sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Datarails and Prophix stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Datarails Prophix first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Datarails on the left and Prophix on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Datarails and Prophix stood in it.

Datarails first, Prophix not the choice

6 of 14 modelsProphix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Datarails alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Planful, Prophix One
GPT-5.4 miniDatarails, Planful alternatives: Anaplan, Vena
Perplexity SonarDatarails, Limelight alternatives: Abacum, Workday Adaptive Planning
Grok 4.1 FastCube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Jirav alternatives: Abacum
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Lucanet xP&A, Mosaic
Muse Glimmer 30BDatarails alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Mosaic, Planful

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallAbacum alternatives: Cube, Datarails
DeepSeek V4 FlashCube alternatives: Datarails, Jirav, Planful, Vena
MiniMax M2.5Drivetrain alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Datarails, Pigment

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashAleph, Cube alternatives: Abacum, Bob Finance, Pigment, Vena
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashVena, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Fathom, PlanGuru
Kimi K2Drivetrain alternatives: Mosaic, Pigment
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Cube, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Prophix is not named for this buyer.
Datarails3%#6 of 10
Prophix—not named
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Datarails leads by five points.
Datarails11%#4 of 14
Prophix6%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Datarails0%#– of 12
Prophix0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Datarails

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“I would choose Datarails for an Excel-heavy mid-market B2B finance team, and Limelight for a team that wants a more modern standalone modeling platform” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“"For most mid-market finance teams, especially those managing multiple entities in Excel, Datarails is the best financial modeling software in 2026."” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market finance teams, especially those managing multiple entities in Excel, Datarails is the best financial modeling software in 2026.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Prophix, Oracle Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud: Full-featured, complex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.