Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Prophix · September 2026 Edition
9 categories · Ranked

Prophix

168Judge labels
21First choices
23Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
9Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Financial consolidation for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
8 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Prophix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Financial consolidationAccounting and close19%1 of 963%30accepted challenger
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis12%3 of 959%23accepted challenger
FP&A platformsPlanning and analysis6%7 of 5212%17accepted challenger
Financial close managementAccounting and close5%3 of 689%11accepted challenger
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%27 of 1330%5under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Financial modeling and scenario planningPlanning and analysis0%23 of 1140%4under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash0%82 of 86100%2under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance0%52 of 980%2under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%
Board and investor reportingPlanning and analysis0%79 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Prophix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Prophix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.5145010
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash05319
Perplexity Sonar182011
Grok 4.1 Fast152311
Mistral Small23319
DeepSeek V4 Flash354113
Llama 4 Maverick12205
Qwen 3.7 Flash03003
Kimi K2360110
GLM 4.7 FlashX33118
MiniMax M2.531105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct46 labels14
Paraphrase28 labels4
Comparative40 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained22 labels2
Negative23 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative168 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Prophix One™ – Best for Planning + Financial Close in One Platform ... Designed specifically for mid-market organizations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One is particularly notable for its ability to connect consolidation to the close and planning in one platform.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Prophix if you want the best balance of consolidation depth, planning integration, and mid-market fit” Kimi K2 · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One – best if you want close, planning, and consolidation in one platform with strong governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Prophix (slow performance, limited functionality, steep learning curve)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like OneStream or Prophix are powerful but geared toward larger/enterprise (higher cost, 6+ mo impl.)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Most dedicated financial close software (e.g., FloQast, BlackLine, Cube, Prophix) uses custom pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · soft negative
“Be wary of mid-market tools (Centage, Datarails, Vena, Prophix) if you are a small business” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prophix, over the 168 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prophix was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vena113 of 16810Compare →
Planful101 of 16812Compare →
OneStream74 of 16820Not in the top three
Workday Adaptive Planning74 of 1680Not in the top three
Anaplan72 of 1684Not in the top three
Datarails67 of 1689Not in the top three
Cube49 of 1686Not in the top three
Pigment40 of 1684Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM36 of 1685Not in the top three
CCH Tagetik34 of 1683Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prophix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 151 of the 168 answers that named Prophix and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Prophix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prophix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Prophix One 28Prophix One™ 3Prophix One / Planful 1Prophix One FP&A Plus 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prophix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prophix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prophix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.