Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Financial reporting › Sage Intacct vs Fathom
Financial reporting and dashboards · September 2026 Edition

Sage Intacct vs Fathom

Ten of twelve models named Sage Intacct first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Sage Intacct was named by twelve of the twelve models and Fathom by eleven and Sage Intacct carries 18 labels and Fathom 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Sage Intacct

accepted challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share27%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%24%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1817A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Sage Intacct reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vena was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Sage Intacct vs Vena · Fathom vs Vena

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial reporting and dashboards page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Sage IntacctFirst choices, of twelve modelsFathom
Direct1001 against Fathom
Paraphrase161 against Fathom
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Fathom
Scale-constrained20
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Sage Intacct and Fathom stood in it.

Sage Intacct first, Fathom an alternative

10 of 12 modelsFathom was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sage Intacct, Vena alternatives: Datarails, FineReport, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Planful
GPT-5.4 miniSage Intacct alternatives: Oracle NetSuite
Perplexity SonarSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Prophix, Vena
Grok 4.1 FastSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Vena
Mistral SmallSage Intacct alternatives: Fairview, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickSage Intacct
Qwen 3.7 FlashSage Intacct alternatives: Fathom, Looker Studio, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, Vena
Kimi K2Sage Intacct, Vena alternatives: Cube, Datarails
MiniMax M2.5Sage Intacct alternatives: Cube, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCube, Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, Sage Intacct
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails, Vena alternatives: Cube, HighRadius, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fathom leads by fifteen points.
Fathom15%#3 of 11
Sage Intacct0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Sage Intacct leads at mid-market.
Sage Intacct27%#1 of 14
Fathom12%#2 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Sage Intacct0%#– of 10
Fathom0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Sage Intacct

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“For most mid-market B2B companies not on a heavy subscription revenue model, Sage Intacct is the most commonly cited "best" choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid pricier tools like Fathom ($53/mo) unless needed.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid this if you already have a senior financial controller who needs complex driver-based modeling; this is more of a "reporting" tool” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“dedicated FP&A/reporting tools like Fathom or specialized platforms (which are pricier, typically $50+/mo and aimed at mid-market)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Fathom delivers the best balance of speed, accounting integration, and value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Sage Intacct vs VenaFathom vs VenaThe full financial reporting standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.