Sage · 17 categories · RankedSage Intacct
418Judge labels
86First choices
64Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
17Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
40% in Accounting software for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 56 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
8 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 36 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA mid-market product: leader at mid-market, not named at small business.
Small business8 of 37
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market1 of 56
40%36 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise5 of 53
8%40 labels
accepted challenger
In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sage Intacct for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 40% | 1 of 56 | 3% | 36 | endorsed leader |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 27% | 1 of 133 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 25% | 1 of 79 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 19% | 3 of 96 | 14% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 15% | 2 of 77 | 13% | 31 | accepted challenger |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 11% | 2 of 94 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 11% | 4 of 70 | 3% | 34 | accepted challenger |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 5% | 6 of 86 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19% |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 2% | 10 of 72 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 11 of 60 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19% |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 39 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18% |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 55 of 68 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60% |
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 24 of 60 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36% |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 77 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15% |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 49 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35% |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 33 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 34% |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 75 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sage Intacct yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Sage Intacct across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 14 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 20 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 22 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 17 |
| Kimi K2 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 22 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 6 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 17 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct105 labels41
Paraphrase101 labels37
Comparative78 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels1
Scale-constrained55 labels7
Negative43 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative418 labels in all, every segment counted; 86 of the 90 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Sage Intacct is a cloud-based ERP solution designed for mid-market companies handling complex financial operations, automating invoicing, accounts receivable management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“Sage Intacct: Strong in multi‑entity consolidation, dimensional reporting, and multi‑book capabilities. Often praised for user experience and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounting software · scale prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies not on a heavy subscription revenue model, Sage Intacct is the most commonly cited "best" choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“The market leader for finance-first, service-based, healthcare, and SaaS organizations. Outstanding dimensional reporting, strong APIs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Jumping straight to enterprise tools like Sage Intacct or Zuora would blow most limited budgets.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid spreadsheets or full ERPs like NetSuite/Sage Intacct—they're error-prone or too expensive” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid ... heavy ERP replacements (like NetSuite or Sage Intacct)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative
“If you use a Tier 1 ERP (like Oracle NetSuite or Sage Intacct), they will often claim they have native revenue recognition. However, their standard packages are frequently too basic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sage Intacct, over the 418 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sage Intacct was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sage Intacct. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 344 of the 418 answers that named Sage Intacct and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
worldmetrics.org103
erpresearch.com85
g2.com63
learn.g2.com62
ramp.com61
softwareconnect.com57
netsuite.com56
dualentry.com55
capterra.com53
highradius.com53
648 of the 648 domain citations in answers naming Sage Intacct came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Sage Intacct
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sage Intacct; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sage Intacct with Sage Copilot 6Sage Intacct (with Sage Copilot) 2Intacct 1Sage 1Sage 50cloud / Sage Intacct 1Sage Intacct (with Built-In Finance Agents) 1Sage Intacct / NetSuite ARM 1Sage Intacct AP 1Sage Intacct Reconciliation Module 1Sage Intacct lease accounting 1Sage Intacct with AI features/Copilot 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sage Intacct's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sage Intacct, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sageintacct.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.