AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › FP&A platforms › Centage vs Clockwork
FP&A platforms · October 2026 Edition

Centage vs Clockwork

One of fourteen models named Centage first on the direct prompt; zero named Clockwork. Centage was named by eight of the fourteen models and Clockwork by eight and Centage carries 16 labels and Clockwork 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Centage

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Clockwork

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Centage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vena was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Planful vs Centage · Planful vs Clockwork · Fathom vs Centage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CentageFirst choices, of fourteen modelsClockwork
Direct10
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained021 against Centage
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Centage and Clockwork stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Centage Clockwork first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Centage on the left and Clockwork on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Centage and Clockwork stood in it.

Centage first, Clockwork not the choice

1 of 14 modelsClockwork was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallCentage alternatives: Abacum, Drivetrain, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastVena alternatives: Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful
Muse Glimmer 30BPigment alternatives: Abacum, Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Vena

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aleph, Cube alternatives: Pigment, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning
GPT-5.4 miniPlanful alternatives: Pigment, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashVena alternatives: Aleph, Bob Finance, Cube, Pigment, Planful
Perplexity SonarAbacum, Planful alternatives: Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashDatarails, Drivetrain alternatives: Cube, Jirav, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashVena alternatives: Aleph, Cube, Planful
Kimi K2Cube alternatives: Aleph, Datarails, Drivetrain, Jirav, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXAbacum, Drivetrain alternatives: Cube, Vena
MiniMax M2.5Vena alternatives: Drivetrain, Parse
GPT-6 LunaAbacum alternatives: Planful, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Clockwork leads by eleven points.
Clockwork11%#2 of 16
Centage0%#13 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Centage4%#7 of 18
Clockwork4%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Centage0%#– of 14
Clockwork0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Centage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Options to Avoid ... Centage — Starts around $1,750–$2,250/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Centage: Ideal for mid-market finance teams with revenues between $25M and $500M.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Centage – purpose-built for your size range” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Centage and Jirav win at the small end, where the buyer actually gets a published price” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Clockwork

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Clockwork is the best FP&A software in 2026 — it delivers forecasting, scenario planning, and an AI analyst at transparent SMB pricing” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“starting with one of the lower-priced options like Fathom or Clockwork is a practical choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“consider alternative FP&A software tools that are more suitable for small businesses, such as Clockwork, LiveFlow, and Jirav.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.