Every category where a model named Centage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	2%	10 of 52	6%	17	accepted challenger
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	53 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Centage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Centage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Centage – Best for mid-market finance teams ($25M–$500M revenue) that have outgrown Excel” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · first choice

“If budget is a primary concern, Centage offers strong automation without enterprise pricing.” MiniMax M2.5 · FP&A platforms · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Centage if you want the fastest path to a standardized, automated annual operating plan.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · alternative

“Centage is designed for mid-market finance teams ($25M-$500M revenue...) that outgrew Excel” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be wary of mid-market tools (Centage, Datarails, Vena, Prophix) if you are a small business or have simple requirements.” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centage, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workday Adaptive Planning23 of 342Not in the top three

Planful21 of 341Not in the top three

Datarails20 of 345Not in the top three

Vena20 of 345Not in the top three

Cube19 of 343Not in the top three

Anaplan17 of 341Not in the top three

Pigment16 of 345Not in the top three

Prophix13 of 342Not in the top three

Aleph12 of 340Not in the top three

Jirav11 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 34 answers that named Centage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

centage.comYour site25

getaleph.com25

drivetrain.ai23

cfoshortlist.com16

cubesoftware.com12

golimelight.com12

aibusinessgeek.com11

learn.g2.com11

financecopilothq.com10

clockwork.ai9

129 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming Centage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

centage.com/blog/best-fp-a-software23

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-planning-analysis-software19

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202618

getaleph.com/answers/best-fpa-software-by-company-size13

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-fpa-software-202611

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software10

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-20269

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-fpa-software-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at centage.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.