Finance AI Index
Index Planning and analysis FP&A platforms › Vena vs Fathom
FP&A platforms · September 2026 Edition

Vena vs Fathom

Two of twelve models named Vena first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Vena was named by twelve of the twelve models and Fathom by ten and Vena carries 45 labels and Fathom 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vena

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share15%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels4510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vena reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pigment was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Vena vs Pigment · Vena vs Clockwork · Vena vs Planful

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VenaFirst choices, of twelve modelsFathom
Direct20
Paraphrase50
Comparative10
Budget-constrained051 against Vena
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against Vena
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vena and Fathom stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Vena Fathom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vena on the left and Fathom on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vena and Fathom stood in it.

Vena first, Fathom not the choice

2 of 12 modelsFathom was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPlanful, Vena alternatives: Cube, Datarails
Grok 4.1 FastCube, Vena alternatives: Datarails, Pigment

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Pigment, Prophix, Vena
Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Pigment, Prophix, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashDatarails alternatives: Planful, Prophix, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDrivetrain alternatives: Bob Finance, Cube, Planful
Mistral SmallCentage alternatives: Abacum, Aleph, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning
MiniMax M2.5Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fathom leads by eleven points.
Fathom13%#2 of 13
Vena2%#7 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Vena leads at mid-market.
Vena15%#1 of 16
Fathom10%#5 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Fathom is not named for this buyer.
Vena0%#12 of 12
Fathomnot named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vena

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“"would rather eat a bullet than use it again." ... Anaplan and Vena are the two with the most consistent negative sentiment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If data sovereignty and verified security audits are non-negotiable for you, this is a major red flag.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Vena (ongoing performance, learning curve, support, and security concerns)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Go with Vena if your finance team wants to continue modeling in Excel but needs to eliminate spreadsheet errors and automate data ingestion from your ERP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Vena or Datarails if you have a small to mid-sized finance team that wants to retain the comfort of using Excel” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Fathom (cheapest) or Clockwork (best overall for forecasting + AI) are your strongest picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Fathom – Best Value for Money ... Fathom is the most cost-effective professional solution” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.