Index › Planning and analysis › FP&A platforms › Fathom vs Prophix

FP&A platforms · September 2026 Edition

Fathom vs Prophix

Zero of twelve models named Fathom first on the direct prompt; zero named Prophix. Fathom was named by ten of the twelve models and Prophix by nine and Fathom carries 10 labels and Prophix 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Prophix

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share10%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.

Labels1017A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fathom reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pigment was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Vena vs Fathom · Vena vs Prophix · Pigment vs Fathom

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

FathomFirst choices, of twelve modelsProphix

Direct00

Paraphrase03

Comparative00

Budget-constrained50

Scale-constrained00

Negative002 against Prophix

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fathom and Prophix stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Fathom

Prophix

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fathom on the left and Prophix on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fathom and Prophix stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Pigment, Prophix, Vena

Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Pigment, Prophix, Vena

DeepSeek V4 FlashDatarails alternatives: Planful, Prophix, Vena

GLM 4.7 FlashXPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniPlanful, Vena alternatives: Cube, Datarails

Gemini 3.5 FlashDrivetrain alternatives: Bob Finance, Cube, Planful

Grok 4.1 FastCube, Vena alternatives: Datarails, Pigment

Mistral SmallCentage alternatives: Abacum, Aleph, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning

Llama 4 MaverickPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning

Qwen 3.7 FlashPigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning

Kimi K2Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Workday Adaptive Planning

MiniMax M2.5Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Centage, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Fathom leads by thirteen points.

Fathom#2 of 13

Prophix#– of 13

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Fathom leads by four points.

Fathom#5 of 16

Prophix#7 of 16

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Fathom is not named for this buyer.

Fathomnot named

Prophix#– of 12

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Fathom (cheapest) or Clockwork (best overall for forecasting + AI) are your strongest picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“Fathom – Best Value for Money ... Fathom is the most cost-effective professional solution” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Prophix (slow performance, limited functionality, steep learning curve)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative

“Be wary of mid-market tools (Centage, Datarails, Vena, Prophix) if you are a small business” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative

Also compared

Vena vs Fathom Vena vs Prophix Pigment vs Fathom Pigment vs Prophix Clockwork vs Fathom Clockwork vs Prophix Planful vs Fathom Planful vs Prophix Fathom vs Cube Fathom vs Datarails Cube vs Prophix Prophix vs Datarails All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full FP&A platforms standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.