SaaS metrics and analytics · September 2026 Edition
ChartMogul vs Baremetrics
Seven of twelve models named ChartMogul first on the direct prompt; one named Baremetrics. Both were named by all twelve models and ChartMogul carries 54 labels and Baremetrics 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share45%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5441A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartMogul reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartMogul vs ProfitWell Metrics · ChartMogul vs Looker Studio · ChartMogul vs Databox
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas metrics and analytics page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartMogulFirst choices, of twelve modelsBaremetrics
Direct711 against Baremetrics
Paraphrase120
Comparative93
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained001 against Baremetrics
Negative005 against ChartMogul · 7 against Baremetrics
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, ChartMogul and Baremetrics were named in the same answer 124 times, of the 163 answers naming ChartMogul and the 127 naming Baremetrics. In those answers Baremetrics took the first choice six times and ChartMogul forty-nine.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ChartMogul and Baremetrics stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | |
ChartMogul Baremetrics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartMogul on the left and Baremetrics on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartMogul and Baremetrics stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.MiniMax M2.5Baremetrics, ChartMogul alternatives: Microsoft Power BI
ChartMogul first, Baremetrics an alternative
6 of 12 modelsBaremetrics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5ChartMogul alternatives: Amplitude, Baremetrics, HubSpot Operations Hub, Looker
Grok 4.1 FastChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Looker Studio, Maxio, Paddle Retain, Stripe Sigma, Tableau/Power BI
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, ProfitWell / Paddle Retain, Sigma Computing
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartMogul alternatives: Catalyst, Paddle
Kimi K2ChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartMogul, Databox alternatives: HockeyStack, Maxio
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashSubscript alternatives: ChartMogul, Equals, Maxio
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Power BI, Tableau alternatives: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel
Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniProfitWell Metrics alternatives: Amplitude, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Tableau
Perplexity SonarFairview alternatives: Databox, Microsoft Power BI
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ChartMogul leads by twenty-nine points.
ChartMogul37%#1 of 10Baremetrics8%#4 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
ChartMogul leads by forty-three points.
ChartMogul45%#1 of 11Baremetrics2%#5 of 11Enterprise
ChartMogul leads by sixteen points.
ChartMogul19%#1 of 10Baremetrics2%#8 of 10What the models said about ChartMogul
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Pricing scales aggressively with MRR ... some report temporary outages, MRR inconsistencies, and "abysmal" support for edge cases” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“ChartMogul | No native dunning (requires third-party), can have definition discrepancies” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“ChartMogul is often recommended, but be cautious about the setup complexity and cost” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market companies transitioning away from spreadsheets, ChartMogul offers the best balance of price, flexibility, and reliability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“go with ChartMogul. If your finance team is drowning in manual Excel sheets ... invest the time and money into Subscript or Maxio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ChartMogul - ChartMogul automates calculating subscription metrics correctly... It's perfect for early-stage to mid-size SaaS companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Baremetrics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Be cautious if: You're sensitive to cost (starts ~$129/mo...) Complaints include poor customer service ... data inconsistencies” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“you have likely outgrown early-stage, plug-and-play tools (like Baremetrics or ProfitWell)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“avoid paying for Baremetrics or ChartMogul unless you need their extra features” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“I just want to know my MRR and Churn. | Baremetrics | Set up in 15 minutes; looks beautiful; simple.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“I would suggest starting with ChartMogul or Baremetrics if you want a purpose-built solution” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want the best pure SaaS revenue dashboard: ChartMogul or Baremetrics.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartMogul vs ProfitWell MetricsChartMogul vs Looker StudioChartMogul vs DataboxChartMogul vs Microsoft Power BIChartMogul vs TableauProfitWell Metrics vs BaremetricsLooker Studio vs BaremetricsDatabox vs BaremetricsBaremetrics vs Microsoft Power BIBaremetrics vs TableauAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full saas metrics standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.