Every category where a model named Baremetrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	2%	5 of 81	22%	41	accepted challenger
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	49 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Baremetrics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Baremetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	3	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	1	2	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	4	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	0	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct25 labels1

Paraphrase21 labels3

Comparative34 labels10not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative24 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative127 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I just want to know my MRR and Churn. | Baremetrics | Set up in 15 minutes; looks beautiful; simple.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · first choice

“I would suggest starting with ChartMogul or Baremetrics if you want a purpose-built solution” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · first choice

“If you want the best pure SaaS revenue dashboard: ChartMogul or Baremetrics.” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose ChartMogul (multi-source) or Baremetrics (Stripe-native)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be cautious if: You're sensitive to cost (starts ~$129/mo...) Complaints include poor customer service ... data inconsistencies” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

“you have likely outgrown early-stage, plug-and-play tools (like Baremetrics or ProfitWell)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · soft negative

“avoid paying for Baremetrics or ChartMogul unless you need their extra features” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

“whereas simpler tools like Baremetrics focus strictly on operational analytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Baremetrics, over the 127 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Baremetrics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul124 of 12749Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics78 of 12723Not in the top three

Mixpanel53 of 1270Not in the top three

Databox52 of 1278Not in the top three

Amplitude48 of 1271Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI39 of 1273Not in the top three

Tableau37 of 1272Not in the top three

Looker36 of 1270Not in the top three

PostHog34 of 1272Not in the top three

Maxio24 of 1273Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Baremetrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 127 answers that named Baremetrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com70

baremetrics.comYour site63

databox.com53

getfairview.com52

saasrise.com35

saashero.net27

artisangrowthstrategies.com24

taskade.com24

fastero.com22

chartsy.app21

328 of the 391 domain citations in answers naming Baremetrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools70

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance38

saasrise.com/blog/saas-metrics-platform-rankings-report35

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-profitwell33

getfairview.com/best/saas-metrics-software28

taskade.com/blog/saas-metrics-dashboard-templates24

artisangrowthstrategies.com/blog/profitwell-vs-chartmogul-vs-baremetrics-202622

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-which-is-right-for-your-business21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Baremetrics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Baremetrics; a claim can dispute any of them.

BareMetrics 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Baremetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Baremetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at baremetrics.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.