Nine of fourteen models named Enable first on the direct prompt; one named incentX. Enable was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and incentX by nine and Enable carries 57 labels and incentX 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the rebate management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Enable and incentX were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 176 answers naming Enable and the 51 naming incentX. In those answers incentX took the first choice eleven times and Enable twenty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“avoiding heavy enterprise-tier systems (like Enable, Pricefx, or Vendavo), which typically come with massive upfront implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... Enable | $650–$2,500+/month” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Some highly robust systems (like *Enable*, which recently acquired *Flintfox*) are incredibly powerful but have a very steep learning curve.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Positioned as the best fit overall for manufacturers and trading partners that need controlled B2B rebate workflows with claim approvals and settlement reconciliation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Enable because the available review summary explicitly positions it as the best overall fit for B2B rebate workflows” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Enable ... For most mid-market B2B companies, Enable represents the best balance of features, pricing, and implementation speed.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“incentX (Best for Traditional B2B Rebates & Trade Spend) ... frequently cited as a top contender for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“incentX – Best for sales-driven rebate automation and transaction-aware incentive programs.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for B2B Rebates & Commissions: incentX” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.