Every category where a model named incentX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Rebate management	Receivables and billing	9%	4 of 80	0%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for incentX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated incentX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels3

Paraphrase11 labels2

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels5

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“incentX (Best for Traditional B2B Rebates & Trade Spend) ... frequently cited as a top contender for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Rebate management · budget prompt · first choice

“incentX – Best for sales-driven rebate automation and transaction-aware incentive programs.” Mistral Small · Rebate management · direct prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for B2B Rebates & Commissions: incentX” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Rebate management · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: incentX” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Rebate management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as incentX, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and incentX was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Enable46 of 5121Compare →

Vistex33 of 512Not among the top eight

e-bate23 of 519Compare →

Vendavo23 of 514Not among the top eight

Voucherify22 of 512Compare →

Model N16 of 510Not among the top eight

Pricefx16 of 510Not among the top eight

Flintfox7 of 510Compare →

Channelscaler6 of 512Not among the top eight

Rebates-On6 of 511Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named incentX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named incentX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com46

sourceforge.net39

oncentive.io35

theretailexec.com34

enable.com29

guideflow.com27

level6.com26

us.fitgap.com24

worldmetrics.org24

zipdo.co20

304 of the 304 domain citations in answers naming incentX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/rebate-management41

oncentive.io/blog/best-rebate-management-software35

theretailexec.com/tools/best-rebate-management-software34

level6.com/blog/best-rebate-management-tools26

guideflow.com/blog/rebate-management-software25

sourceforge.net/software/rebate-management/for-small-business24

sourceforge.net/software/rebate-management21

enable.com/19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

incentx.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, incentX takes 9% of first choices and Enable takes 52%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rebate management platform”

Position for “rebate management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“incentx”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 854 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 534 · 13 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 660
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 80 in rebate management

Segment leader

52%

Enable

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 51 answers
Its own site cited: in 51 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on incentx.com

107

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 15

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	58	0	2026-06-22
Comparison	2	0	2025-08-25
Template or tool	1	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	undated
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-06-22Sales procedures blog
2026-06-08Pipeline coverage ratio blog
2026-05-25Sales territory design blog
2026-04-13Benefits of sales forecasting blog
2026-03-30Steps of sales forecasting blog
2026-01-04Sales plan templates blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page incentx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as incentX

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as incentX; a claim can dispute any of them.

OnCentive/incentX 1

Follow incentX

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

incentX is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Streamline with incentX Incentive Compensation Management Software
incentx.com
For: Businesses
incentx.com/pricing
Price stated: Call for Pricing; there is NO fee for INDEPENDENT setup; FULL-SERVICE has a one-time fee of $7500; No hidden fees incentx.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: schedule a trial of incentX today incentx.com
Integrations claimed: 8 incentx.com
Certifications: AICPA SOCOnline Product Training and Software Certification
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, hosting, customers

What incentX's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: incentx.com, incentx.com/pricing, trust.incentx.com, incentx.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when incentX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as incentX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for incentX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where incentX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name incentX, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.