Tradogram vs Zip
Zero of fourteen models named Tradogram first on the direct prompt; zero named Zip. Tradogram was named by nine of the fourteen models and Zip by ten and Tradogram carries 12 labels and Zip 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the procure-to-pay page.
By framing
TradogramFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZip
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Tradogram Zip first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tradogram on the left and Zip on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tradogram11%#4 of 11Zip0%#– of 11Zip2%#6 of 8Tradogram0%#– of 8What the models said about Tradogram
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Tradogram is the best balance of cost and full P2P functionality, thanks to its free tier and $99/month entry point.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Zip
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Very fast intake and approval workflows, but may feel lighter than traditional P2P suites.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Zip: The gold standard for "intake-to-pay". Highly rated for its user interface and ability to orchestrate complex approvals” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.