Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Tradogram · September 2026 Edition

4 categories · Ranked

Tradogram

148Judge labels

45First choices

3Negative labels

12 of 12Models named it

4Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

45% in Strategic sourcing for small business buyers

Rank 2 of 127 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 19 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.

Small business1 of 150

No model named it for this buyer.

In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tradogram for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	15%	2 of 127	0%	19	accepted challenger
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	6%	4 of 85	0%	18	accepted challenger
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	6%	4 of 80	0%	11	accepted challenger
Spend management platforms	Spend and procurement	0%	20 of 39	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tradogram yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tradogram across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	2	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	4	2	7
Mistral Small	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	3	3	1	7
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	3	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	4	1	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct25 labels8

Paraphrase25 labels12

Comparative21 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained55 labels22

Scale-constrained7 labels3

Negative15 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative148 labels in all, every segment counted; 45 of the 51 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with Tradogram or Prokuria as they offer strong e-sourcing and RFP functionality without enterprise-level pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Ramp ... or Tradogram if you need more robust procurement features at a low monthly cost” MiniMax M2.5 · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · first choice

“Recommended as the best for SMB (small and medium-sized business) sourcing, offering features tailored to smaller budgets” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · first choice

“Tradogram (Best Free Option) ... Truly minimal budget / starting out: Start with Tradogram's free plan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tradogram, over the 148 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tradogram was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Precoro104 of 14830Compare →

Procurify80 of 14812Not in the top three

Coupa63 of 1481Not in the top three

SAP Ariba58 of 1481Not in the top three

Ramp40 of 14813Not in the top three

Spendwise30 of 1484Not in the top three

ProcureDesk22 of 1481Not in the top three

oboloo21 of 14810Not in the top three

Jaggaer21 of 1480Not in the top three

Ivalua20 of 1480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tradogram. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 128 of the 148 answers that named Tradogram and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com76

g2.com71

tradogram.comYour site71

softwareadvice.com53

spendflo.com52

learn.g2.com49

mindsprint.com44

walkme.com42

ramp.com40

auravms.com36

463 of the 534 domain citations in answers naming Tradogram came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tradogram.com/blog/12-best-purchasing-software-for-small-mid-size-companies62

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software42

ramp.com/blog/procurement-software-small-business30

walkme.com/blog/best-strategic-sourcing-software26

softwareadvice.com/scm/strategic-sourcing-software-comparison24

spendflo.com/blog/procurement-software-for-small-business-success24

g2.com/categories/strategic-sourcing/small-business23

procurementvms.com/procurement/best-procurement-software.html23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tradogram

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tradogram; a claim can dispute any of them.

TRADOGRAM 1Tradogram Free/Basic Plan 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tradogram's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tradogram, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tradogram.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.