Gatekeeper vs Coupa
One of twelve models named Gatekeeper first on the direct prompt; zero named Coupa. Gatekeeper was named by eleven of the twelve models and Coupa by twelve and Gatekeeper carries 19 labels and Coupa 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in ten categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the supplier management page.
By framing
GatekeeperFirst choices, of twelve modelsCoupa
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Gatekeeper Coupa first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Gatekeeper on the left and Coupa on the right.The direct prompt
Gatekeeper first, Coupa not the choice
1 of 12 modelsCoupa was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Gatekeeper0%#6 of 10Coupa0%#10 of 10Coupa23%#2 of 7Gatekeeper5%#5 of 7What the models said about Gatekeeper
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Smaller/mid-market alternatives like Gatekeeper (contract-focused, ~$875/mo) ... exist but lack the full SRM depth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · soft negative
“~$1,245/month | Contract lifecycle management | Mid-market businesses needing contract management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“Gatekeeper has emerged as the industry standard for organisations that demand a unified, risk-first approach to supplier management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Gatekeeper if vendor contracts, compliance, and governance are central to your needs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Gatekeeper ... this is the strongest choice for the mid-market.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Coupa
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Coupa (especially the supplier portal) ... Suppliers frequently complain that the Coupa Supplier Portal is confusing and difficult to navigate” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple issues reported with user interface and navigation... "clunky, poorly designed interface" and unprofessional support” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend Coupa if your priority is a broad, scalable platform for vendor onboarding plus spend/procurement management” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.