Two of twelve models named AuditBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Diligent One Platform. AuditBoard was named by twelve of the twelve models and Diligent One Platform by ten and AuditBoard carries 33 labels and Diligent One Platform 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Workiva, AuditBoard, LogicGate – Overkill, quote-only, and almost always over $40k/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“steer clear of heavy, traditional enterprise GRC ... like Workiva, AuditBoard, or MetricStream” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“AuditBoard and BlackLine appear to start closer to $50K/year or more” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“If I had to pick one default recommendation, I'd choose AuditBoard because it is positioned as the top pick for internal controls management” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend AuditBoard if your main need is a strong, scalable internal controls / SOX / risk management platform” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Often ranked as the #1 tool for internal controls management, especially for SOX compliance and audit workflows.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“It is expensive (often $180k–$350k/year for mid-market packages) and has a steeper learning curve. It is likely overkill” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with HighBond or AuditBoard as they offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HighBond is praised for ongoing evidence collection and clear exception follow-through, making them both strong choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose HighBond if you need strong SOX compliance with traceable evidence” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.