Diligent · 3 categories · RankedDiligent One Platform
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 4% | 5 of 71 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 2% | 13 of 97 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 0% | 54 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you are looking to move away from scattered emails, Dropbox folders, and static PDF attachments, Diligent is the industry standard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with HighBond or AuditBoard as they offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HighBond is praised for ongoing evidence collection and clear exception follow-through, making them both strong choices” Mistral Small · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose HighBond if you need strong SOX compliance with traceable evidence” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It is expensive (often $180k–$350k/year for mid-market packages) and has a steeper learning curve. It is likely overkill” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 58 answers that named Diligent One Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
226 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming Diligent One Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Diligent One Platform
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent One Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent One Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.