Three of twelve models named Tesorio first on the direct prompt; four named Chaser. Tesorio was named by eleven of the twelve models and Chaser by nine and Tesorio carries 22 labels and Chaser 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cash flow forecasting page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Tesorio: Users report sync issues with ERP systems, invoicing delays, and missing features around payment recording and reporting” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“1. Tesorio – Best for B2B SaaS & Tech Companies ... Choose Tesorio if you're in tech/SaaS and want the most accurate AR-based forecasting” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Tesorio is a good fit for mid-market SaaS and subscription businesses that need forecasting and AR automation in one platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Best for Collection Uncertainty: Chaser ... Chaser is highly rated for mid-market B2B businesses” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.