Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Aclymate · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Aclymate

17Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in ESG and carbon reporting for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 76 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aclymate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate0%20 of 760%6under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aclymate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aclymate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Very small SMB budget: Aclymate or Sweep basic” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative
“Aclymate (Best ultra-low-cost all-in-one for global SMBs)” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative
“Aclymate is an excellent SME/mid-market option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Consider Aclymate for simple carbon tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aclymate, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aclymate was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Greenly12 of 174Not in the top three
Persefoni10 of 174Not in the top three
Workiva8 of 170Not in the top three
Sweep7 of 171Not in the top three
IBM Envizi6 of 170Not in the top three
Sustain.Life5 of 173Not in the top three
Watershed4 of 170Not in the top three
ExecutESG3 of 171Not in the top three
Coolset3 of 170Not in the top three
Emerald Power3 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aclymate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named Aclymate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coolset.com10
g2.com10
guideflow.com10
aibusinessgeek.com8
gartner.com8
emissiontwin.com7
onestopesg.com7
aigreentools.com6
executesg.com6
knowesg.com6

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Aclymate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aclymate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aclymate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aclymate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack