Every category where a model named Diligent ESG for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	16 of 76	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diligent ESG yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diligent ESG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“export to a dedicated reporting platform like Workiva or Diligent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · first choice

“If you want to manage ESG as a corporate board liability and compliance risk, choose Diligent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Diligent ESG if ESG must live inside board, risk, and governance workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Governance and board-level integration.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“strong platform, but pricing is typically quote-based and more likely to fit mid-market/enterprise budgets” GPT-5.4 mini · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diligent ESG, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent ESG was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva35 of 3613Not in the top three

IBM Envizi24 of 360Not in the top three

Persefoni19 of 362Not in the top three

Watershed18 of 361Not in the top three

Sweep18 of 360Not in the top three

Novisto15 of 360Not in the top three

Greenly13 of 365Not in the top three

Sphera12 of 360Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower10 of 360Not in the top three

Normative9 of 360Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent ESG. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 36 answers that named Diligent ESG and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com19

gartner.com18

coolset.com16

esg-one.co14

pulsora.com12

emeraldpower.io11

onestopesg.com11

knowesg.com9

sopact.com9

sustaenia.com9

128 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming Diligent ESG came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software19

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software18

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools16

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison12

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software12

emeraldpower.io/articles/top-10-esg-reporting-software-platforms-for-2026-global-guide11

onestopesg.com/esg-resources/best-esg-reporting-software10

knowesg.com/esg-reporting-tools9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Diligent ESG

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent ESG; a claim can dispute any of them.

Diligent 2Diligent ESG (formerly Accuvio) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent ESG's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent ESG, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.