Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Budgyt · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Budgyt

16Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Budgyt was named 5 times in Corporate performance ma and 2 other categories, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business31 of 88

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Budgyt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	24 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	39 of 114	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	27 of 52	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Budgyt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Budgyt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Budgyt – from $250/month. Solid for basic budgeting and forecasting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“Budgyt is the most affordable "true" EPM database” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

“Budgyt or Dryrun (Cheapest Entry Points)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Budgyt, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Budgyt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Jirav11 of 161Not in the top three

Cube10 of 162Not in the top three

Fathom8 of 161Not in the top three

Causal7 of 160Not in the top three

Datarails6 of 160Not in the top three

LiveFlow6 of 160Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 160Not in the top three

Vena5 of 160Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning5 of 160Not in the top three

Clockwork4 of 163Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Budgyt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Budgyt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai11

cubesoftware.com10

golimelight.com9

learn.g2.com6

farseer.com5

fathomhq.com5

thecfoclub.com5

clockwork.ai4

cyberpress.org4

cybersecuritynews.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Budgyt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

golimelight.com/blog/fpa-software-for-small-business7

cubesoftware.com/blog/financial-modeling-software6

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-modeling-software5

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-modelling-software-tools5

clockwork.ai/blog/best-fpa-software-small-business4

cyberpress.org/epm-tools-by-business-size-34

cybersecuritynews.com/best-endpoint-privilege-management-tools/amp4

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Budgyt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Budgyt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at budgyt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.