Every category where a model named Anaplan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	2%	16 of 95	56%	41	criticized challenger
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	52 of 52	61%	38	criticized challenger
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	113 of 114	47%	19	criticized challenger
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	24 of 86	20%	15	accepted challenger
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	45 of 96	27%	11	criticized challenger
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	101 of 133	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Anaplan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Anaplan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	9	1	10
GPT-5.4 mini	0	5	1	1	7
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	14	15
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	1	3	7
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	7	6	14
Mistral Small	1	0	7	1	9
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	11	15
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	4	2	6
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	5	1	10	17
Kimi K2	0	0	2	7	9
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	4	2	4	10
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	5	3	9

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct72 labels21

Paraphrase78 labels25

Comparative80 labels9not counted in share

Budget-constrained67 labels9

Scale-constrained65 labels5

Negative76 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative438 labels in all, every segment counted; 60 of the 71 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong FP&A features” Mistral Small · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Depends on size (enterprise: Anaplan; SMB: Cube), tools (Excel lovers: Vena), and needs (Workday users: Adaptive)” Grok 4.1 Fast · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Anaplan if you are a large multinational needing complex cross-departmental modeling.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Planning‑centric platform (includes consolidation) | Organizations that want to embed consolidation in a broader FP&A workflow” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid or be cautious about enterprise platforms (Anaplan, Workday Adaptive, Planful, Pigment) unless you have the budget and need for their complexity.” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“High-End Consolidation Platforms (Anaplan, OneStream, Hyperion): These are powerful but priced for mid-market and large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

“you generally want to avoid heavy enterprise platforms like Anaplan or Oracle (which cost tens of thousands annually)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative

“You generally want to avoid enterprise-grade tools (like Anaplan or Workday) which cost thousands per month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial modeling · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Anaplan, over the 438 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anaplan was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workday Adaptive Planning305 of 43818Not in the top three

OneStream204 of 43825Not in the top three

Vena193 of 43824Not in the top three

Pigment156 of 43822Not in the top three

Planful153 of 4388Not in the top three

Cube138 of 43824Not in the top three

Datarails113 of 43813Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM108 of 43812Not in the top three

Board79 of 4383Not in the top three

Prophix72 of 4386Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anaplan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 343 of the 438 answers that named Anaplan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai174

cfoshortlist.com127

cubesoftware.com127

golimelight.com104

getaleph.com101

worldmetrics.org101

g2.com82

learn.g2.com79

board.com75

gartner.com73

1,043 of the 1,043 domain citations in answers naming Anaplan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software70

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software64

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202661

centage.com/blog/best-fp-a-software51

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-planning-analysis-software46

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises44

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software43

learn.g2.com/best-fpa-software43

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Anaplan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anaplan; a claim can dispute any of them.

Anaplan (by Workday) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anaplan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anaplan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at anaplan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.