Finance AI Index
Index › Vendors › Chase Ink · September 2026 Edition
Chase · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Chase Ink

9Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Chase Ink was named 3 times in Corporate cards, where Ramp led with 69%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 67
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 63
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Chase Ink for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate cardsSpend and procurement0%25 of 6333%3under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 69%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chase Ink yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chase Ink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Sign-up bonuses and traditional bank benefits” Kimi K2 · Corporate cards · comparative prompt · alternative
“Chase Ink Business (Best Sign-Up Bonuses)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate cards · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Traditional Bank-Backed Cards With a Personal Guarantee (e.g., Chase Ink, Amex Business, Capital One Spark)- Why to be cautious:” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate cards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chase Ink, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chase Ink was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Brex8 of 91Not in the top three
Ramp7 of 94Not in the top three
BILL Spend & Expense7 of 91Not in the top three
American Express5 of 90Not in the top three
Rho3 of 90Not in the top three
Airwallex2 of 90Not in the top three
American Express Corporate Card2 of 90Not in the top three
Capital One Spark2 of 90Not in the top three
Rippling Spend2 of 90Not in the top three
AXIS1 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chase Ink. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 9 answers that named Chase Ink and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rippling.com5
americassbdc.org3
chase.comYour site3
forbes.com3
itilite.com3
nerdwallet.com3
ramp.com3
reddit.com3
airwallex.com2
brex.com2

Twenty-seven of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Chase Ink came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/best-business-credit-cards4
americassbdc.org/common-pitfalls-in-business-credit-cards-and-how-to-avoid-them3
nerdwallet.com/business/credit-cards/best/corporate3
airwallex.com/en-us/blog/compare-corporate-business-cards2
chase.com/personal/credit-cards/education/basics/pros-and-cons-of-corporate-credit-cards2
itilite.com/blog/corporate-credit-cards-for-small-businesses2
reddit.com/r/fintech/comments/1qua1x3/any_tried_and_tested_takes_on_best_corporate_card2
rippling.com/blog/best-commercial-credit-cards-business2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Chase Ink

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chase Ink; a claim can dispute any of them.
Chase Ink Business 1Chase Ink Business Cards 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chase Ink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chase Ink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack