AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Didit · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Didit

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Didit was named 1 time in AML monitoring, where ComplyAdvantage led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Didit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance0%43 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Didit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Didit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Usage based pricing made explicit for transaction monitoring.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AML monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Didit, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Didit was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sanction Scanner3 of 42Not among the top eight
LexisNexis Risk Solutions2 of 40Not among the top eight
ComplyAdvantage1 of 41Not among the top eight
Dow Jones Risk & Compliance1 of 40Not among the top eight
Flagright1 of 40Not among the top eight
FraudNet1 of 40Not among the top eight
Fraudio1 of 40Not among the top eight
NICE Actimize1 of 40Not among the top eight
NICE Actimize AML Essentials1 of 40Not among the top eight
NameScan1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Didit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Didit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bureau.id3
didit.meYour site3
cside.com2
erpresearch.com2
fraud.net2
fraudio.com2
guideflow.com2
ondato.com2
pwc.com2
riskpublishing.com2

Nineteen of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Didit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

didit.me is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Didit takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“didit”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
26 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,711 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,205 · 31 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,339
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
28 ads · 24 text, 3 video, 1 image · 15 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Didit Identity, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 21 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 43 of 108 in AML monitoring
Segment leader
33%
ComplyAdvantage
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on didit.me
10,000
subdomains included
Content
1,765
counted in the table below
Documentation
996
Product · Integration
1,266 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,207undated
Comparison270undated
Glossary or explainer269122026-08-19
Template or tool13undated
Case study6undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page didit.me exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Didit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Didit is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Infrastructure for identity and fraud. One API for KYC, KYB, Transaction Monitoring, and Wallet Screening.
For
For developers and AI agents.
Price stated
$0.33 per full KYC; $0.15 wallet screening; $0.03 Device & IP analysis; $0.07 per user, per year ongoing AML monitoring; 500 verifications free every month. didit.me
Starting price
0 didit.me
Free plan or trial
500 free verifications every month, forever, no card; free sandbox; create account in under a minute. didit.me
Integrations claimed
25 didit.me
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 1 & Type 2ISO/IEC 27001iBeta Level 1GDPR-nativeEU data residency by defaulteIDAS 2.0MiCAAMLD6
Hosting
EUEuropean Union by default
Customers named
Y CombinatorRobinhood Ventures

What Didit's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: didit.me, didit.me/pricing, didit.me/products, didit.me/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Didit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Didit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Didit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Didit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Didit, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at didit.me is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.